Supreme Court of the United States
Huger v. South Carolina
1797 U.S. LEXIS 201 · 1 L. Ed. 627 · 3 Dall. 339 · 3 U.S. 339
February 10, 1797
Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~182 min
Opinion
IREDELL and CHASE, Justices.
Expressed some doubt, whether shewing the original to the Secretary of State, would have been a service of the process, conformably to the rule, without leaving a copy at the Governor's house: but they agreed with the rest of THE COURT, in deeming the service, under the present circumstances, to be sufficient in strictness of construction, as well as upon principle.
The service of the subpna being thus proved, the Complainant was entitled to proceed ex parte; and, accordingly, moved for and obtained Commissions, to take the examination of witnesses in several of the States.