Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Provenzano

147 F. App'x 431

November 9, 2005 · Docket 05-10504

Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~207 min

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Walter John Provenzano raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir.2005), which held that the Due Process Clause does not bar the application of Justice Breyer’s remedy opinion in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when resentencing defendants in light of Booker. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.