Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Perez
188 F. App'x 321
July 14, 2006 · Docket 05-51673
Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~196 min
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Diego Perez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.