Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Watson v. Lukins

126 Pa. 630 · 17 A. 750 · 1889 Pa. LEXIS 921

May 27, 1889 · Docket No. 93

Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~136 min

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case does not require discussion. It involved a question of fact, which was submitted to the jury with proper instructions by the learned judge who tried the cause below. There was abundant evidence of the ratification by Watson & Raydure of the act of R. A. Watson in purchasing Mr. Lukins’ interest. It would serve no good purpose to review the numerous assignments of error in detail.

Judgment affirmed.