Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wolosin

646 N.E.2d 455 · 71 Ohio St. 3d 611

March 22, 1995 · Docket No. 94-1375

Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~139 min

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but the suspension is stayed, and respondent is placed on probation under the conditions set by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. , concur.