Supreme Court of Minnesota
Thorp v. Lorenz
1885 Minn. LEXIS 244 · 25 N.W. 712 · 34 Minn. 350
December 12, 1885
Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~149 min
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order made on the trial dismissing the action, on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. It has been repeatedly held by this court that an order of this kind is not appealable. Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387, (514;) Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385, (513;) Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285, (316.) The plaintiff should either have moved for a new trial and appealed from the order refusing it, or else caused judgment of dismissal to have been entered, and then appealed from the judgment.
Appeal dismissed.