United States Court of Claims

Penner Installation Corp. v. United States

116 Ct. Cl. 568 · 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100 · 89 F. Supp. 321

April 3, 1950 · Docket No. 47267

Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~142 min

Opinion

OPINION PER CURIAM

Per Curiam:

The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment [114 C. Cls. 585] heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff’s petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capricously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It is so ordered.