Alberti v. Klevenhagen
March 7, 1996 · Docket 95-20164
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-20164 Conference Calendar __________________
LAWRENCE R. ALBERTI ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN, Sheriff,
Defendant,
and
KENNETH M. BANKS,
Movant-Appellant,
versus
JAMES T. OITZINGER,
Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-72-1094 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kenneth M. Banks's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal from the district court's order denying his petition for
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-20164 -2-
writ of mandamus is DENIED. The appeal is frivolous, and it is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Banks was previously warned that filing future frivolous
matters in this court would result in disciplinary sanctions.
See In re Banks, 94-00284 (5th Cir. Mar. 6, 1995). Accordingly,
Banks is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil
appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial
civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's
jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge
of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all
federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to
Banks, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this
bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.