Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Alberti v. Klevenhagen

March 7, 1996 · Docket 95-20164

Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~214 min

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20164 Conference Calendar __________________

LAWRENCE R. ALBERTI ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

versus

JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN, Sheriff,

Defendant,

and

KENNETH M. BANKS,

Movant-Appellant,

versus

JAMES T. OITZINGER,

Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-72-1094 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth M. Banks's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal from the district court's order denying his petition for

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-20164 -2-

writ of mandamus is DENIED. The appeal is frivolous, and it is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Banks was previously warned that filing future frivolous

matters in this court would result in disciplinary sanctions.

See In re Banks, 94-00284 (5th Cir. Mar. 6, 1995). Accordingly,

Banks is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil

appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial

civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Banks, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.