Supreme Court of the United States
Bethell v. Mathews
13 Wall. 1 · 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1300 · 20 L. Ed. 556 · 80 U.S. 1
February 12, 1872
Queued for AI processing — next in lineest. ~141 min
Opinion
It has been often decided that a plaintiff in error cannot take advantage of rulings upon exceptions in his own favor, even if erroneous. Nor can a statement of facts signed by counsel be noticed upon error. * In this case, then, not only was the statement so signed, but it’ does not appear to have been made and filed until after the judgment.
There is, therefore, no error in the record, or none of which we can take notice. The judgment of the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana must be
Affirmed.
Generes v. Bonnemer, 7 Wallace, 564; Avendano v. Gay, 8 Id. 376; Kearney v. Case, 12 Id. 276.